Wednesday 30 March 2011

Austerity cuts, cutting the chances of recovery

This powerful article, written by GUSNA's own Dan Paris, puts the results of the last Westminister election in their political and historic context and illustrates the dangerous situation the Con-Dem cuts have created . It first appeared on the excellent Newsnet Scotland website and is reproduced with the author's permission. 


It’s worth reminding ourselves how we got here.  In the aftermath of the banking crisis, we approached a general election at a time when national debt was spiralling out of control.  The leader of the opposition, David Cameron, argued that in order to control the debt we needed to implement deeper cuts and to implement them more quickly than the cuts proposed by the Labour government. Labour and the Lib Dems argued that this approach risked jeopardising economic recovery.  Nick Clegg said, "There isn't a serious economist in the world who agrees with the Conservatives ... [that] we should pull the rug out from under the economy with immediate spending cuts."
The economy was understandably by far the most important issue in the election.   Life was suddenly becoming more and more difficult for millions across Britain.   Unemployment was up.  After years of prosperity, many people were finding themselves sitting on an overpriced mortgage or credit card debt they couldn’t afford.  The public agreed that the national debt was too high, but the prospect of cuts to public services during already difficult times was difficult to deal with.
After years in the political wilderness, the Conservatives must have felt very optimistic.  They were against a hugely unpopular prime minister; a man who’d never faced election as party leader, lacked charisma, and who as former Chancellor could be blamed for the failure to regulate the banks.  They were in a prime position to regain their status as the natural party of government and sweep to power on a promise to undo the damage of years of mismanagement.
And yet, something interesting happened, the Conservatives lost the argument.  For the first time, televised debates brought the political arguments directly into voters' homes.  It was as close to a single issue election as we’re ever likely to see.  Faced with the arguments a majority voted for parties that rejected the Conservative plans: Labour, Lib Dem, SNP, Plaid Cymru.  Only slightly over a third of the electorate voted Tory. They were the largest party, but could hardly herald this result as any sort of victory.

Keep Reading...

Monday 28 March 2011

NUS Scotland in Labour bias shocker!

This piece, which features on the NUS website, makes the staggering claim that ''the SNP have joined Scottish Labour [sic] in coming out against fees''.

http://www.nus.org.uk/en/News/News/NUS-Scotland-welcomes-SNP-commitment-against-fees

I attempted to comment on this frankly hilarious piece of revisionism on their site, but it has yet to appear. It may be languishing in moderator limbo or as I cannot see any other comments, perhaps such luxuries are reserved for card carrying NUS members.


Does NUS Scotland think the student's have been fast asleep for the last decade?
We all know that Labour are the party who introduced tuition fees through the back door, abandoning completely the principle of education as a right and the idea of the Democratic Intellect. The SNP on the other hand abolished the £2000+ Graduate Endowment in 2008 and increased student support. Without this myself, and scores of other Scots would not have made it to University, not for want of intellect, but for the unforgivable crime of not being born into wealth. No, it is not the students, but NUS who have spent the last decade asleep. When they wake up to the situation, or rather 'if', they will find Scotland and the world much changed.   

While I welcome Labour in Scotland's conversion to the principle of free education, forgive me for being skeptical, given its timing, and their track record. Everyone, even NUS Scotland, knows that it is the Labour group in the Scottish Parliament who have joined the SNP on this policy and not the other way round. It is the desperate acts of a party on the run, bereft of ideas, looking to the SNP for leadership. Well, they could learn a thing or two...free of charge!

Mike Russell and Sandra White on campus!

Another week on the campaign trail kicks off with a visit from two very special guests: Mike Russell MSP and Sandra White MSP. GUSNA were on hand to help with leafleting and speaking to students on campus. We managed to squeeze in a quick coffee with the  pair of them between their meetings with Student Representative Council President Tommy Gore and Principle/Pantomine-Villain Anton Muscatelli. It was great of Mike and Sandra to take the time to show their support for the students at Glasgow Uni at this crucial point in the history of Glasgow Uni. Cheers guys!

Thursday 24 March 2011

GUSNA for Scotland!

Welcome to GUSNA for Scotland, the new blog of the Glasgow University Scottish Nationalist Association!
Watch this space for news, views and photos from the campaign trail!
SAOR ALBA!